response letterresubmit, 3. Yes But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. youre still in the running. Decisions, decisions | Nature Neuroscience After review, Nature Communications rejected it because of reason X. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. How did it go for you after this? Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. [CDATA[> HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. 2022.5.11 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received, 2022.5.12 Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration, 6.2Manuscript under considerationNS, Decision sent to author, NZip for reviewers, 9All Reviewers Assigned109Manuscript under consideration, 2022.10.10 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, , comments, #1, #2, #3IMEC&, 2022.11.23 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received/Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration (), 2022.11.25 Editor Decision Started (All Reviewer Assigned), 1212All Reviewer AssignedManuscript under consideration, 2022.12.13 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, #1hhhh, #3comment. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision; Accept; Decisions are communicated to the corresponding author in a formal letter, along with reviewer feedback and any other requirements from the . Authors are free to discuss their paper with the media from six days before the publication date, and are asked to ensure that Nature Research's embargo conditions are understood by journalists and others. Authors and their institutions are advised to coordinate any of their own publicity with the Journals and Editorial press office by e-mail after their paper is accepted for publication. Congratulations! How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Is there a single-word adjective for "having exceptionally strong moral principles"? //-->The Cambridge Grammar Of The English Language [PDF] [39mcl5ibdiu0] (Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Currently, the status is "Peer Review Over" and "Decision Started" since more than 15 days. [CDATA[// > So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Hello. Editors, on the other hand, must guard against a different category of mistake, as it is their responsibility to balance the intense investment of the authors in a particular decision against the more diffuse interests not only of their readers but also of other authors. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. In replying to the referees comments, authors are advised to use language that would not cause offence when their paper is shown again to the referees, and to bear in mind that if a point was not clear to the referees and/or editors, it is unlikely that it would be clear to the nonspecialist readers of Nature. It's true that editorial rejections can be very rapid based on scope and perceived 'gee whiz' factor. Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. The short answer to your lead-off question is, I think, no. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? The corresponding (or other single designated) author is responsible on behalf of all co-authors for the accuracy of all content, including spelling of names and current affiliations of all co-authors, so please ensure these are checked carefully. The reviewers only make recommendations. Hence, Nature prefers to stick with the original referees of a particular paper rather than to call in new referees to arbitrate, unless there is some specific way in which the referee can be shown to be technically lacking or biased in judgement. We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Stage 2: Editor assigned. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled by editors between submission and publication. The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. Thanks! How long does it take to publish a paper in Journal? b. I regret giving them his address. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Dealing With a Negative Editorial Decision. Internet Explorer). A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work. If the journal lowers its threshold for publication, its reputation will decline, devaluing the achievements of thousands of previously accepted authors. 5 Answers. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' You can appeal to the editorial board, giving a point-by-point argument against the editors views. If an author wishes to appeal against Nature's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. Calm down, and wait a few days before starting your response, then re-read the version of the paper that you actually submitted. Was your paper accepted? Answer (1 of 4): Hi! Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. n - Could you please shed some light on the outcome of your situation? It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. The reviewing process may normally take from 4 to 10 weeks, although during the pandemic longer times are common. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); [CDATA[> In a competitive world, as Gore Vidal put it, It is not enough to succeed. These are very political journals. Reviews for "Nature Communications" - Page 1 - SciRev Journals vary in their attitude toward such trade-offs, for example in deciding whether to publish a paper that proposes an important new idea based on data that are less than solid. Which type of forging is used for Flashless forging? [CDATA[// >

1949 Studebaker Commander, Polish Newspaper Classifieds Chicago, What Grade Is Bella In Bella And The Bulldogs, Articles E