1. It woks only with fallback graphic mode. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE, Ventoy2Disk.exe can't enumerate my USB device. Ventoy just create a virtual cdrom device based on the ISO file and chainload to the bootx64.efi/shim.efi inside the ISO file. Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. Posts: 15 Threads: 4 Joined: Apr 2020 Reputation: 0 0 Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' Format NTFS in Windows: format x: /fs:ntfs /q No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi If you do not see a massive security problem with that, and especially if you are happy to enrol the current version of Ventoy for Secure Boot, without realizing that it actually defeats the whole point of Secure Boot because it can then be used to bypass Secure Boot altogether, then I will suggest that you spend some time reading into trust chains. Thank you! For these who select to bypass secure boot. , Laptop based platform: I didn't expect this folder to be an issue. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. Already on GitHub? slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. This could be useful for data recovery, OS re-installation, or just for booting from USB without thinking about additional steps. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. BUT with Ventoy 1.0.74 legacy boot from the same ISO I get a black square in centre of menu (USB LED is flashing so appears to load). In other words it will make their system behave as if Secure Boot is disabled, which they are unlikely to expect, else they would have disabled Secure Boot altogether to boot said media (which, if they control that system they can always easily do, especially if it's in a temporary fashion to boot a specific media that they know isn't Secure Boot compliant). The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. But, whereas this is good security practice, that is not a requirement. Already on GitHub? Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Failed to Install, Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Fail to Update, Yes. The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. The error sits 45 cm away from the screen, haha. 1: The Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool is not compatible with USB 3.0. Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? Thanks very much for proposing this great OS , tested and added to report. How to make sure that only valid .efi file can be loaded. Unable to boot properly. Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. Ventoy is able to chain boot Windows 10 (build 2004) just fine on the same systems. Hi, thanks for your repley boot i have same error after menu to start hdclone he's go back to the menu with a black windows saying he's loading the iso file to mem and that it freez. Win10UEFI memz.mp4. You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. @steve6375 I've mounted that partition and deleted EFI folder but it's still recognized as EFI, both in Windows Disk Management and the BIOS, just doesn't boot anymore. 4 Ways to Fix Ventoy if It's Not Working [Booting Issues] I made a larger MEMZ.img and that runs on Easy2Boot and grubfm in VBOX but it goes wrong booting via Ventoy for some reason. if it's possible please add UEFI support for this great distro. So, I'm trying to install Arch, but after selecting Arch from Ventoy I keep getting told that "No Bootfile found for UEFI! @pbatard 04-23-2021 02:00 PM. However, Ventoy can be affected by anti-virus software and protection programs. "No bootfile found for UEFI! Can it boot ok? No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. @ventoy used Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk files to disable UEFI file policy, that's the easiest way, but not a 'proper' one. Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). How to Fix No bootfile found for UEFI on a Laptop or Desktop PC - YouTube Error : @FadeMind I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. we have no ability to boot it unless we disable the secure boot because it is not signed. Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. In WIMBOOT mode (ctrl+w) I get 'Loading files. xx%' and then screen resolution changes and get nice Windows Setup GUI. Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed You can change the type or just delete the partition. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250, https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists, chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin, https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso, https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s, https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA. Boots, but cannot find root device. If Secure Boot is not enabled, proceed as normal. 8 Mb. Yes. Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. @blackcrack Again, I think it is very fair to say that, if you use use Ventoy on a Secure Boot enabled system, and you went through Ventoy Secure Boot enrolment, they you expect that ISOs that aren't Secure Boot compliant will be reported, as they would with other means of using them on that system. Won't it be annoying? a media that was created without using Ventoy) running in a Secure Boot environment, so if your point is that because Ventoy uses a means to inject content that Microsoft has chosen not to secure, it makes the whole point of checking Secure Boot useless, then that reasoning logically also applies to official unmodified retail Windows ISOs, because you might as well tell everyone who created a Windows installation media (using the MCT for instance): "There's really no point in having Secure Boot enabled on your system, since someone can just create a Windows media with a malicious Windows\System32\winpeshl.exe payload to compromise your system at early boottime anyway" Again, if someone has Secure Boot enabled, and did not whitelist a third party UEFI bootloader themselves, then they will expect the system to warn them in that third party bootloader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of whether they did enrol a bootloader that chain loaded that third party bootloader. I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". *lil' bow* The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. How to suppress iso files under specific directory . It implements the following features: This preloader allows to use Ventoy with proper Secure Boot verification. Yes, I already understood my mistake. In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. @steve6375 2. If you really want to mount it, you can use the experimental option VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT in Global Control Plugin. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. So I apologise for that. Sign in @ventoy I can confirm this, using the exact same iso. For instance, someone could produce a Windows installation ISO that contains a malicious /efi/boot/bootx64.efi, and, currently, Ventoy will happily boot that ISO even if Secure Boot is enabled. If it fails to do that, then you have created a major security problem, no matter how you look at it. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. 1.0.84 AA64 www.ventoy.net ===> lo importante es conocer las diferencias entre uefi y bios y tambien entre gpt y mbr. It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Format XFS in Linux: sudo mkfs -t xfs /dev/sdb1, It may be related to the motherboard USB 2.0/3.0 port. Go ahead and download Rufus from here. Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. @shasheene of Rescuezilla knows about the problem and they are investigating. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). Official FAQ I have checked the official FAQ. Download ventoy-delete-key-1..iso and copy it to the Ventoy USB drive. 1.0.84 BIOS www.ventoy.net ===> Maybe because of partition type By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. I tested live GeckoLinux STATIC Plasma 152 (based on openSUSE) with ventoy-1.0.15. da1: quirks=0x2. I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. privacy statement. You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' SB works using cryptographic checksums and signatures. When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. Ventoy is supporting almost all of Arch-based Distros well. Don't get me wrong, I understand your concerns and support your position. I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders. all give ERROR on HP Laptop : Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. 3. UEFI Secure Boot (SB) is a verification mechanism for ensuring that code launched by a computer's UEFI firmware is trusted. Ventoy is an open source tool to create a bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. Win10_1909_Chinese(Simplified)_x64.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. All the .efi files may not be booted. Ctrl+i to change boot mode of some ISOs to be more compatible Ctrl+w to use wimboot to boot Windows and WinPE ISOs (e.g. backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB But that not means they trust all the distros booted by Ventoy. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. Have a question about this project? Just found that MEMZ.iso from https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA works, file: Windows XP.ver.SP3.English Okay, I installed linux mint 64 bit on this laptop before. For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. It gets to the root@archiso ~ # prompt just fine using first boot option. Even debian is problematic with this laptop. Could you please also try via BIOS/Legacy mode? Already on GitHub? I have the same error with EndeavorOS_Atlantis_neo_21_5.iso using ventoy 1.0.70. the EndeavorOS iso boots with no issues when on it's on usb, but not through ventoy. 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). All other distros can not be booted. Yes, Ventoy does work within UEFI mode and offers a default secure boot feature. Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. Windows 7 UEFI64 Install - Easy2Boot No. legacy - ok No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi error, asus t100ta Kinda solved: Cant install arch, but can install linux mint 64 bit. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. What you want is for users to be alerted if someone picked a Linux or Microsoft media, and the UEFI bootloader was altered from the original. Again, detecting malicious bootloaders, from any media, is not a bonus. check manjaro-gnome, not working. The Flex image does not support BIOS\Legacy boot - only UEFI64. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy). It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. 22H2 works on Ventoy 1.0.80. Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. wifislax64-2.1-final.iso - 2 GB, obarun-JWM-2020.03.01-x86_64.iso - 1.6 GB, MiniTool_Partition_Wizard_10.2.3_Technician_WinPE.iso - 350 MB, artix-cinnamon-s6-20200210-x86_64.iso - 1.88 GB, Parrot-security-4.8_x64.iso - 4.03 GB . It's a bug I introduced with Rescuezilla v2.4. Well occasionally send you account related emails. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi All of these security things are there to mitigate risks. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. Some commands in Ventoy grub can modify the contents of the ISO and must be disabled for users to use on their own under secure boot. For me I'm missing Hiren's Boot CD (https://www.hirensbootcd.org/) - it's WindowsPE based and supports UEFI from USB. What exactly is the problem? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00 Many thousands of people use Ventoy, the website has a list of tested ISOs. I am not using a grub external menu. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). The program can be used to created bootable USB media from a variety of image formats, including ISO, WIM, IMG and VHD. Also ZFS is really good. sharafat.pages.dev Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? They boot from Ventoy just fine. Inspection of the filesystem within the iso image shows the boot file(s) - including the UEFI bootfile - in the respective directory. - . My guess is it does not. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. Are you using an grub2 External Menu (F6)? This disk, after being installed on a USB flash drive and booted from, effectively disables Secure Boot protection features and temporary allows to perform almost all actions with the PC as if Secure Boot is disabled. But, currently, that is not the case at all, which means that, independently of the merits of Secure Boot for this or that type of media (which is a completely different debate altogether), there is a breach of the security contract that the user expects to see enforced and therefore something that needs to be addressed. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB I will test it in a realmachine later. Help !!!!!!! Yes. Openbsd is based. debes activar modo uefi en el bios What matters is what users perceive and expect. EFI Blocked !!!!!!! Exactly. After the reboot, select Delete MOK and click Continue. I see your point, this CorePlus ISO is indeed missing that EFI file. I'd be interested in a shim for Rufus as well, since I have the same issue with wanting UEFI:NTFS signed for Secure Boot, but using GRUB 2 code for the driver, that makes Secure Boot signing it impossible. This filesystem offers better compatibility with Window OS, macOS, and Linux. Ventoy - Easy2Boot Still having issues? But Ventoy currently does. Option 1: Completly by pass the secure boot like the current release. No! But i have added ISO file by Rufus. Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. Mybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! That's actually very hard to do, and IMO is pointless in Ventoy case. Seriously? Thnx again. My guesd is it does not. what is the working solution? I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. may tanong po ulit ako yung pc ko po " no bootfile found for uefi image does not support x64 uefi" i am using ventoy galing po sa linux ko, gusto ko po isang laptop ko gawin naman windows, ganyan po lagi naka ilang ulit na po ako, laptop ko po kasi ayaw na bumalik sa windows mula nung ginawa ko syang linux, nagtampo siguro kaya gusto ko na po ibalik sa windows salamat po sa makakasagot at sa . unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. Acer nitro 5 windows 10 for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. This will disable validation policy override, making Secure Book work as desired: it will load only signed files (+ files signed with SHIM MOK key). Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. It works for me if rename extension to .img - tested on a Lenovo IdeaPad 300. The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). Forum rules Before you post please read how to get help. Once here, scroll down and move to the "Download Windows 11 Disk Image (ISO) for x64 devices" section. Yeah to clarify, my problem is a little different and i should've made that more clear. For the two bugs. Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. I you want to spare yourself some setup headaches, take a USB crafted as a Ventoy or SG2D USB that contains KL ISO files, directly. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT They can choose to run a signed Ubuntu EFI file and Ventoy can change it's default function using scripts and file injection. The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. If you use Rufus to write the same ISO file to the same USB stick and boot in your computer. I've tried Debian itself, Kubuntu, NEON, and Proxmox, and all freeze after being selected in the Ventoy menu. @chromer030 hello. Main Edition Support. only ventoy give error "No bootfile found for UEFI! ? I cannot boot into Ventoy with Secure Boot enabled on my machine though, it only boots when I disable Secure Boot in BIOS. The current Secure Boot implementation should be renamed from "Secure Boot support" to "Secure Boot circumvention/bypass", the documentation should state about its pros and cons, and Ventoy should probably ask to delete enrolled key (or at least include KeyTool, it's open-source). it doesn't support Bluetooth and doesn't have nvidia's proprietary drivers but it's very easy to install. Let us know in the comments which solution worked for you. for the suggestions. I checked and they don't work. Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. Tried it yesterday. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. Legacy? If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. Select "Partition scheme" as MBR (Master Boot Record) and "File system" as NTFS. relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi After boot into the Ventoy main menu, pay attention to the lower left corner of the screen: DSAService.exe (Intel Driver & Support Assistant). They can't eliminate them totally, but they can provide an additional level of protection. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. Windows 11 21h2 x64 Hebrew - Successfully tested on UFEI. If everything is fine, I'll prepare the repo, prettify the code and write detailed compilation and usage instructions, as well as help @ventoy with integration. to your account, Hi ! Users can update Ventoy by installing the latest version or using VentoyU, a Ventoy updater utility. There are many kinds of WinPE. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. Extra Ventoy hotkey features: F1 or 1 - load the payoad file into memory first (useful for some small DOS and Linx ISOs). And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. For these who select to bypass secure boot. Any way to disable UEFI booting capability from Ventoy and only leave legacy? @pbatard Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea).

Labradoodle And Cavoodle Rescue Australia, Why Was Yongle Vulnerable As China's Ruler, Ian Kenny First Wife, Angus Macdonald Roshven, Missing Persons In Louisville Ky 2020, Articles V